翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Narraport, Victoria ・ Narratio Prima ・ Narration ・ Narrative ・ Narrative art ・ Narrative ballet ・ Narrative clip ・ Narrative communication ・ Narrative criticism ・ Narrative designer ・ Narrative environment ・ Narrative ethics ・ Narrative evaluation ・ Narrative game ・ Narrative gerontology ・ Narrative history ・ Narrative hook ・ Narrative identity ・ Narrative inquiry ・ Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics ・ Narrative journalism ・ Narrative logic ・ Narrative Magazine ・ Narrative medicine ・ Narrative network ・ Narrative of events of Bloody Sunday (1972) ・ Narrative of Some Things of New Spain and of the Great City of Temestitan ・ Narrative of the abduction phenomenon ・ Narrative of the Chinese Embassy to the Khan of the Tourgouth Tartars, in the years 1712, 13, 14, and 15 ・ Narrative of the Expedition of an American Squadron to the China Seas and Japan Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Narrative history ： ウィキペディア英語版 Narrative history Narrative history is the practice of writing history in a story-based form. It can be divided into two subgenres: the traditional narrative and the modern narrative. Traditional narrative focuses on the chronological order of history, it is event driven and tends to center upon individuals, action, and intention. For example, in regard to the French Revolution, a historian who works with the traditional narrative might be more interested in the revolution as a single entity (one revolution), centre it in Paris, and rely heavily upon large figures such as Maximilien Robespierre. Conversely, modern narrative typically focuses on structures and general trends. A modern narrative would break from rigid chronology if the historian felt it explained the concept better. In terms of the French Revolution, a historian working with the modern narrative might show general traits that were shared by revolutionaries across France but would also illustrate regional variations from those general trends (many confluent revolutions). Also this type of historian might use different sociological factors to show why different types of people supported the general revolution. Historians who use the modern narrative might say that the traditional narrative focuses too much on what happened and not enough on why and causation. Also, that this form of narrative reduces history into neat boxes and thereby does an injustice to history. J H Hexter characterised such historians as "lumpers". In an essay on Christopher Hill, he remarked that "lumpers do not like accidents: they would prefer them vanish...The lumping historian wants to put all of the past into boxes..and then to tie all the boxes together into one nice shapely bundle." Historians who utilize the traditional narrative might say that the modern narrative overburdens the reader with trivial data that had no significant effect on the progression of history; that it is the historian's duty to take out what is inconsequential from history because to do otherwise might commit an injustice to the reader, who might end up believing that minor trivial events were actually important. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Narrative history」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.